retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules block 652313 by 652312 thanks
Hi Julien, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > > > I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change > > > > rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest (just > > > > took care of spooles last night, working on hypre now) so this will > > > > motivate me to finish up hypre, scotch and mumps -- I'll take care of > > > > those three. > > > > > > > What are the archs where those rebuilds are needed? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Julien > > > > armel, armhf, mips, mipsel, s390, s390x, sparc. > > > Can't do that for blacs-mpi, it's broken: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650804 The bug is in the lam implementation, which does not include an f90 wrapper. When the rebuild happens, it will use mpich2 which does have an f90 wrapper so it should work. So please schedule this build. > Scheduled rebuilds for scalapack. Unfortunately scalapack depends on blacs-mpi, so blacs-mpi needs to go first. Looking at the log of the scheduled build, scalapack failed because it doesn't have an mpich2 target, so that will need just a bit of work, please do not schedule a second build of scalapack. > suitesparse doesn't seem to have any lam dependencies? D'oh! You're right. My mistake, closing that bug now. Thanks, Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
