On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 01:30:43PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:56:00AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > This patch has been included in Ubuntu precise. Please consider uploading > > > it to Debian as well - libjpeg8 seems to be up to date in testing, so it > > > doesn't look like there should be any transitions blocking it now? > > > I am concerned that some packages will FTBFS or be build without jpeg > > support because they depended on the old path, and this will slow down the > > transition of the packages that still depend on libjpeg62. > > > So I need to do a test build of all packages build-depending on libjpeg8 > > and I will not have time until December. > > Ok. FWIW, the Ubuntu precise archive was opened with libjpeg8 providing > libjpeg-dev, and we have a full archive rebuild scheduled for January; so if > this is still an issue at that point, we should be able to get you some > feedback about related build failures.
Well, I have completed my test and it seems that only ossim would FTBFS, see #640819. I did not find any packages that lost jpeg support after the rebuild, so I will proceed as soon as ossim is fixed. Cheers, Bill. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
