Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Given that NMU would put you in a bad position, and given that a > reimplementation is ruled out (luckily), how about co-maintenance? > Would you be willing to have a debhelper co-maintenance who would > essentially only keep an eye on debhelper parts that --- for political > or other reasons --- you don't want to touch? If you're available to > consider this option, I can try to help by looking for and proposing > candidates to you.
no -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
