On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 08:04:41PM +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: > Enrico Tassi <gareuselesi...@debian.org> writes: > Because you made the C++ variant a separate library with mangled > names, it is not compatible with previously compiled modules.
You are right, I should fix that. Or if you did that already, just drop me a patch. > (I wonder why liblua5.1-curl.so.0.0.0 does not declare a > dependency on liblua5.1.so.0 even though it uses functions from > that.) This is intended since you don't need the shared library to use the lua module. The lua interpreter is statically linked for performance reasons and exports the same symbols. Any other software statically linked with lua could do the same. This is reasonably common in the Lua world. Cheers -- Enrico Tassi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
