On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 14:32 +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > Good that you took the time to change the code, I'm currently working on > > completing the dynamic allocation solution. > > It's important to note that I used the chance to refactor the code a bit, so > the logic is slightly different. When you read the code, note that I use a > stack-based fixed size buffer as long as it is sufficient and go to dyn > alloced memory only if necessary. I guess dyn alloc will never happen in > practice (but I tested under valgrind control and it looks rather well).
OK! > We have a bugzilla at http://bugzilla.adiscon.com and the mailing list is at > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > Which way you use doesn't really matter to me, I am fine with either way. > Just note that anything that is related to the packaging is not touched by > me. I follow the debian bug tracker and try to pull out things that I can > address. Michael does a great job to remind me if I overlook things (what > happens...). Of course, I know packaging issues are not touched by upstream, so the configuration/startup scripts are Debian specific, right? Then, I'll file a Debian bug for /etc/init.d/rsyslog. Another issue is about writing a Hurd-specific plugin file: plugins/imklog/gnu.c. However, this is not an urgent matter so it can wait until later. Thanks! > Just be warned that I will soon leave for xmas vacation and I > have a big bunch of things in front of me, so I will probably not be able to > change anything before I leave. I wish you a Merry Christmas then :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
