On Dec 16, Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> it would be nice to know if you're in favour of adding modules.d support > or not; and if you'd like to have a patch for it or not. I still have not made up my mind, the examples you described are not very relevant since they require a run time decision. A good argument against implementing this is that with time the number of modules which should be loaded unconditionally at boot time but cannot be autoloaded should get smaller and smaller. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
