W dniu 15.12.2011 22:42, Luca Capello pisze: > NB, your reply should have been a follow-up to [1] and to the Debian > BTS: I replied on purpose to all the people who asked for an updated > version to document the status on the BTS (which is supposed to stay > "forever", not like this mailing list).
I just wanted to ask question and wasn't sure if cluttering BTS was a good idea. >> I'm also interested in building packages of Bacula 5.2.x. Recently Luca >> Capello said [1] that there is updated repo [2] that provides 5.2.1 >> version. debian/control file is quite old so I'm not sure if this repo >> is correct one or I miss something. >> >> [1] >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-bacula-devel/2011-December/000113.html >> [2] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-bacula/pkg-bacula.git;a=summary > > What does it mean that the Git debian/control is quite old? Have you > checked it against the last package available in Debian, to find out > where is the problem? > Indeed, the Git repository at [2] is missing the last uploaded Debian > version: Hauke, I guess you forgot a `git pull`, can you do it, please? This is what I meant 'old debian/control' :) I looked for some development branch with you improved build procedure. I really look forward for it. I tried to fix it by myself (build all DB drivers at one time) but stuck in shlibs packaging. > BTW, the Git repository should be 'bacula.git' and not 'pkg-bacula.git', > given that it has never been included in any official Debian > package yet I will fix it in the next days. Great :) -- Bartosz Cisek Admin email: bartosz.ci...@nasza-klasa.pl tel: +48 519 300 122 Nasza Klasa Sp. z o.o., ul. Gen. J. Bema 2, 50-265 Wrocław Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu, VI Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, nr KRS:0000289629, NIP:898-21-22-104 REGON:020586020, Kapitał zakładowy: 67 850,00 PLN -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
