On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 18:21, Nico Golde <n...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > * Muammar El Khatib <muammarelkha...@gmail.com> [2011-12-13 18:16]: >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 18:01, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > [...] >> >> I have confirmed this one. And a screenshot can be found attached to this >> >> mail. >> > >> > What's the status? >> > >> >> Upstream seems to not care about it. >> >> > Has this been fixed in the last approx. two years? >> > >> >> No, it has not... I am not sure I'd be able to fix this by myself, btw. > > Given the number of instant messaging clients in the archive, what about > removing amsn? I doubt it would stand a serious audit anyway and given that it > is written in tcl, I also doubt it can be properly maintained by anyone who is > not the upstream.
That's right. There many IM clients out there. I don't have a strong opinion on removing aMSN. What I don't know is if it will not like/will affect to the users of it (given the statistics in popcon). On the other hand, I have read on the webpage of aMSN that they plan to release (some day) a version based on Python. I have already tested such a version, and it is not in that good shape still. Finally, I am inclined to accept that which be better for Debian either being removing aMSN or not. Regards, -- Muammar El Khatib. Linux user: 403107. GPG Key = 127029F1 http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org ,''`. : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
