also sprach Daniel Burrows <dburr...@debian.org> [2004.12.14.0120 +0100]: > Why? There's nothing confidential about the information in the > log file; if you want to (eg) find out what vulnerable software > is available on the system, the apt cache (which is also > unprotected by default) is a much better place to look.
I am of the opinion that not more information than necessary should be made available. On the other side of things is "convenience". In the case of this bug, since the maintainer(s) have reservations, I have no problem staying with the status quo. I would have liked it better the other way, but I can live… -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
