Package: dma
Version: 0.0.2010.06.17-6
Severity: normal
dma adds an invalid Received: line to outgoing mail:
Received: from news (uid 9)
(envelope-from n...@myserver.xs4all.nl)
id 1a8d7
by myserver.xs4all.nl (DragonFly Mail Agent)
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:40:01 +0100
sendmail does this, spot the difference:
Received: (from root@localhost)
by someserver.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id pASB00Nq034531;
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:00:00 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from root)
According to RFC2822, the syntax of the Received: line should be:
received = "Received:" name-val-list ";" date-time CRLF
As you can see, the semi-colon between the name-val-list
and date-time is missing in dma's received line.
This makes (anti-spam) systems that parse Received: line headers
complain. It might also add to the "spamminess" score of mail
sent by dma.
It should probably look more like:
Received: from news (uid 9)
by myserver.xs4all.nl (DragonFly Mail Agent) id 1a8d7;
Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:40:01 +0100
(envelope-from n...@myserver.xs4all.nl)
.. but just adding the semicolon is enough to make it rfc2822-compliant.
Mike.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
