Hi Charles, Charles Plessy wrote:
> this summer you have submitted a bug against the Debian policy, about “what > the > license information in the copyright file actually means”. After reading > again > the whole discussion, my feeling is that much of the answer would be actually > be given by a resolution of http://bugs.debian.org/462996, about documenting > more precisely what the Debian copyright file needs to cover. I don't think so. Wasn't Nicholas's report about how to deal with cases where upstream permits "License A or License B" but the Debian maintainer for a package is only interested in one of the two (for example, how and whether to avoid distributing a copy of the GFDL-1.1, which is not part of common-licenses and whose terms do not comply with the DFSG, for a GFDL-1.1+ work)? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
