Dear Dirk,
thank you again for your quick response. Am Samstag, den 26.11.2011, 15:35 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > On 26 November 2011 at 22:10, Paul Menzel wrote: > | Am Samstag, den 26.11.2011, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: > | > On 26 November 2011 at 18:57, Paul Menzel wrote: > | > | Package: littler > | > | Version: 0.1.5-1 > | > | Severity: normal > | > | > | > | Dear Debian folks, > | > > | > There is a single maintainer for the littler package, and his name is > Dirk. > | > | I am sorry. I used that term because all Debian developers and users > | should try to fix bugs. And sometimes the maintainers are not as devoted > | as you are. > > What makes you think all developers would read a bug report against one > particular package? not all. But for example for GNOME packages a lot of times Debian developers deal with bug reports although they are not the maintainer. > | > | since the package rbenchmark is not packaged in Debian I installed it > using `install.packages()`. Then it was installed in my home directory I > believe. > | > > | > Your problem. Always check what .libPaths() says: > | > > | > edd@max:~$ r -e 'print(.libPaths())' > | > [1] "/usr/local/lib/R/site-library" "/usr/lib/R/site-library" > | > [3] "/usr/lib/R/library" > | > edd@max:~$ > | > | It says the same on my system. > | > | > So on my system an installation __done with littler__ goes to > /usr/local/lib/R/site-library > | > | Well, since I have not changed anything by default using > | `install.packages()` it goes into `~/R/i486-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.14/`. > > You shouldn't have to change anything. Apart maybe from making sure you (and > not jyst root) can write into /usr/local/lib/R/site-library/ > > This is set from /etc/R/Renviron Looking at `/etc/R/Renviron` I see the following line. R_LIBS_USER=${R_LIBS_USER-'~/R/i486-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.14'} Could that be added to littler’s default path when looking for packages? > | > In fact littler comes with two short example scripts 'install.r' and > | > 'update.r' I use all the time. Eg (for a not-required re-installation:) > | > > | > edd@max:~$ ~/bin/install.r rbenchmark > | > trying URL 'http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/rbenchmark_0.3.tar.gz' > | > Content type 'application/x-gzip' length 3504 bytes > | > opened URL > | > ================================================== > | > downloaded 3504 bytes > | > > | > * installing *source* package ‘rbenchmark’ ... > | > ** R > | > ** preparing package for lazy loading > | > ** help > | > *** installing help indices > | > ** building package indices ... > | > ** testing if installed package can be loaded > | > > | > * DONE (rbenchmark) > | > > | > The downloaded packages are in > | > ‘/tmp/downloaded_packages’ > | > edd@max:~$ r -lrbenchmark -e 'res <- benchmark(function() {}); print(res)' > | > test replications elapsed relative user.self sys.self user.child > | > 1 function() { 100 0.001 1 0 0 0 > | > sys.child > | > 1 0 > | > edd@max:~$ > | > | I did not know about these scripts and that they should be used for > | installing packages. See #648981 [3]. > > "Should be used" is too strong. I wrote them for my use as I find them > convenient. I see. But not having a references to them in for example the README I will find them too late because I am not checking out everything before starting to use a program. > | > | Executing `R` and then `library(rbenchmark)` works. > | > | > | > | Now I wanted to try `fibonacci.r` from the examples of the Rcpp package > (`r-cran-rcpp` [2]). > | > | > | > | $ cp /usr/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/examples/Misc/fibonacci.r > /tmp/ > | > | $ r fibonacci.r # includes `library(rbenchmark)` > | > | > | > | This aborts with an error that the package `rbenchmark` cannot be found. > | > | > | > | $ LANG=C r fibonacci.r > | > | Loading required package: inline > | > | Loading required package: methods > | > | Loading required package: compiler > | > | Error in library(rbenchmark) : there is no package called > 'rbenchmark' > | > | Execution halted > | > | > | > | Is littler supposed to work in such a setup? > | > > | > Well, yes. I use littler for all the blog posts you refer to. > | > > | > Read help(Startup) and figure out your paths. > | > > | > Not a bug. Next time, just ask on r-sig-debian, please. > | > | Is there a way to get that working by default? Should the path `~/R/` > | which gets used by default for installing packages be added somewhere? > | Or a new item to the FAQ in `README.gz`? > > Please do read 'help(Startup)' and how you can influence .ldPaths() -- and if > you prefer to install in ~/R you have to figure out how to make sure littler > looks there too. As written above, that path seems to be taken from `/etc/R/Renviron`. Amicalement, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part