Le Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:45:30 -0600, Kenny Hitt <hittsj...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi. Actually python-pyatspi and python-pyatspi2 provide the same > interface on one side, but interface to different and not conpatibal > releases of at-spi. Eventually, python-pyatspi2 and at-spi2 will > become the default, but at-spi2 still has bugs not found in at-spi. Are these bugs severe? The accessibility features in gnome-shell 3.2 are becoming more integrated and indirectly require pyatspi. I'm not sure we want to keep components that are using orbit in the GNOME 3 desktop. Cheers Laurent Bigonville > > Kenny > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Well actually there is python-pyatspi (built from at-spi) and > > python-pyatspi2 (built from pyatspi) that conflict with each other. > > > > I think that both are using the same API, so the package built from > > at-spi could be dropped and python-pyatspi2 could be renamed to > > python-pyatspi. > > > > That of course should be coordinated with the GNOME team. > > > > Cheers > > > > Laurent Bigonville > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > > debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of > > "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > > Archive: > > http://lists.debian.org/20111121195742.5fba4...@fornost.bigon.be > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
