On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:20:22AM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Package: perl > > Version: 5.14.2-2 > > Severity: normal > > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: hurd > > > A few tests fail on hurd-i386: > > > > Failed 9 tests out of 2029, 99.56% okay. > > ../cpan/Sys-Syslog/t/syslog.t > > ../cpan/Time-HiRes/t/HiRes.t > > ../cpan/autodie/t/recv.t > > ../dist/IO/t/io_pipe.t > > ../dist/threads/t/libc.t > > ../dist/threads/t/stack.t > > ../ext/Socket/t/socketpair.t > > io/pipe.t > > op/sigdispatch.t > > > > Could you mark them as TODO on GNU/Hurd? > > Has anybody looked at the issues behind these failures? > > I'd like to have a separate bug for each one, whether in hurd or perl, > so that we could at least refer to them in the Debian patch that marks > the tests as TODO.
I agree. > However, instead of patching the tests, I think I'd actually prefer just > making debian/rules ignore test failures on GNU/Hurd so that the failures > would stay visible in the build log. Possibly this should be accompanied > by an RC bug on hurd so that the issues have to be resolved one way > or another if it becomes a release architecture. The effect of TODO in t/test.pl it to run the tests but not make them fatal, I believe, so I don't think this holds? -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
