Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > > > > It is not the same upstream. They don't even look related. > > > > Sorry, at first glance they did indeed seem to have a very similar > > API. > > Also, the library installs itself in /usr/lib/ocaml/cairo2/ so it > should not interfere with the existing cario bindings which install > in /usr/lib/ocaml/cairo/ .
I have a piece of code that used to use the old cairo-ocaml bindings and I have just converted it to use these new bindings. The changes were pretty minor and I have not yet noticed any breakage in comparison to the older bindings. What I have noticed about the newer bindings: - They seem more complete (old bindings didn't seem to support functionality that had been recently added to Cairo). - Better use of modules and default parameters. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org