Hi, On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:38:30AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, den 21.11.2011, 01:46 +0100 schrieb Michael Banck: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:26:08PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > This is because libSCcints and (at least) libSCmbptr12 are not shipped > > > in libsc7. > > > > Turns out those are only enabled when libint is present: > > > > |AC_CHECK_HEADERS(libint/libint.h, > > | AC_CHECK_LIB(int,init_libint_base, > > | HAVE_LIBINT=yes > > | AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LIBINT) > > | AC_SUBST(HAVE_LIBINT) > > | LIBS="-lint $LIBS" > > | ) > > | ) > > [...] > > |if test ! X$HAVE_LIBR12 = Xyes -o ! X$HAVE_LIBINT = Xyes; then > > | EXCLUDED_DIRS="-x SRC_LIB_CHEMISTRY_QC_CINTS -x > > SRC_LIB_CHEMISTRY_QC_MBPTR12 $EXCLUDED_DIRS" > > |fi > > > > We should really look into getting libint into Debian. > > Well libint 1.x is not a big problem (I already started the basic > packaging work some time ago). The configuration stuff is pretty ugly, > but I guess, we can handle it. But the 1.x series is not longer > supported. libint2 is the library to go, but it is (AFAIK) developed > together with/for newer mpqc. I have doubts, if it is really useful to > package libint1. IMO we should really check out, what is necessary to > package current mpqc code and if this mpqc works with all the Debian > packages currently relying on the last mpqc release.
Well, libint1 also enhances cp2k and (I think) at least abinit. As I said, I will contact the libint/mpqc author, but I doubt that a release will happen in time for wheezy, and I am even less confident about a stable libint2 library release. So I think having libint1 as a stop-gap measure in case mpqc3 is way off would be sensible. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
