On 21.11.11 Matthew Wakeling (matt...@wakeling.homeip.net) wrote: Hi,
> If I run detex with the argument "--version", then I get: > > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - - > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - v > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - r > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - i > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - o > Segmentation fault > > While this may seem an odd thing to do, the segfault is worrying, > and should be investigated. A locally-compiled version of detex > 2.8 downloaded from upstream does not exhibit the same problem - it > produces the following: > > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - - > detex: warning: unknown option ignored - v > detex: error: -e option requires and argument > Just for the records: I can reproduce the problem using unstable. Recompiling the texlive-binaries package does not solve the problem. Then I download the detex package from http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/trinkle/detex/ (it is not on CTAN AFAICT), but failed to compile it hille@sid:~/detex-2.8 $ make sed -f states.sed detex.l > xxx.l lex xxx.l rm -f xxx.l mv lex.yy.c detex.c cc -O -c -o detex.o detex.c xxx.l:77:7: error: conflicting types for ‘malloc’ H. -- sigmentation fault
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
