Sorry another typo that should of course be Character. On 19 Nov 2011 08:57, "john knightley" <john.knight...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Definitely Charcter better than Chinese - though for the T and the X it is > much harder to say. > On 19 Nov 2011 08:49, "john knightley" <john.knight...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Flexible Character Input Tool for Xwindows >> On 19 Nov 2011 07:54, "Justin B Rye" <j...@edlug.org.uk> wrote: >> >>> Aron Xu wrote: >>> > Thanks for all your help! I'm going to follow your advices and change >>> > the description >>> > : >>> > Description: Flexible Input Method Framework >>> >>> The long description looks good, but given that this synopsis >>> obviously isn't telling us what fcitx stands for, it doesn't need >>> capital letters - the usual rules would make it: >>> >>> Description: flexible input method framework >>> >>> Of course this now leaves the name as a bit of a mystery, but it might >>> take more time than it's worth to explain that, if it now stands for >>> Free/Flexible/Friendly Chinese/Character/Customizable >>> Input/Interaction/Indication Toy/Tool/Technology of/for >>> X11/Xenography/uniX! >>> -- >>> JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian >>> sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pkg-ime-devel mailing list >>> pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org >>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ime-devel >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-ime-devel mailing list > pkg-ime-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ime-devel >
