Hi You requested to remove the source package, though it was not what you were after. You'd should have asked the removel of the i386 and mips binary packages (which also kept the old source in the archive).
Note that versioned removals are not implemented, one either requests to remove a package completely (removal of a source package) or to remove particular architectures. Only the most recent version on any architecture (together with their source) are kept in any case. So please take care of using the correct bug title. As you're not after a removal anymore, it would also make sense to retitle the current bug title and try to reach someone of the team through IRC if you really don't want to reupload. Cheers Luk On 11/18/2011 03:19 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: > reopen 648732 > thanks > > Hi, > > I asked packages in unstable/non-free to be removed but packages in main > including manually moved orig.tar.gz has been removed. > > This certainly causes trouble for the following upload. > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ipadic_2.7.0-4.html#source-lintian > > See interesting message on non-existing README.source. "How is > education supposed to make me feel smarter? ... Error, couldn't extract > source, WTF?" Sure ... the orig.tar.gz file was removed. I understand > dak does not handle situation of moving package from non-free to main. > > As I read 648732-cl...@bugs.debian.org messages below, it was removing > ipadic | 2.7.0-2 | source, amd64 > ipadic-common | 2.7.0-2 | all > > I did not ask to do so. > > Please reinstate orig.tar.gz and move the followings to unstable. > > ipadic | 2.7.0-4 | source, amd64 > ipadic-common | 2.7.0-4 | all > > Regards, > > Osamu > ============== > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:03:43AM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report >> which was filed against the ftp.debian.org package: >> >> #648732: RM: ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | unstable/non-free | source, i386, mips >> >> It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>. >> >> Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. >> If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a >> better one in a separate message then please contact Debian FTP Masters >> <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> by >> replying to this email. >> >> >> -- >> 648732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648732 >> Debian Bug Tracking System >> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > >> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:01:55 +0000 >> From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> >> To: 648732-cl...@bugs.debian.org >> Cc: ipa...@packages.debian.org, ipa...@packages.qa.debian.org >> Subject: Bug#648732: Removed package(s) from unstable >> >> We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following >> package(s) have been removed from unstable: >> >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | source, i386, mips >> ipadic | 2.7.0-2 | source, amd64 >> ipadic-common | 2.7.0-2 | all >> >> ------------------- Reason ------------------- >> | 2.6.3-2 | unstable/non-free | source, i386, mips >> ---------------------------------------------- >> >> Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag >> database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. >> The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite >> references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references >> it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the >> master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any >> mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the >> earliest. >> >> Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks >> unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed >> from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency >> problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is >> really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. >> >> We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package >> automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed >> correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. >> >> Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you >> have further comments please address them to 648...@bugs.debian.org. >> >> The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/648732 >> >> This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is >> a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing >> ftpmas...@debian.org. >> >> Debian distribution maintenance software >> pp. >> Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) >> > >> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:18:21 +0900 >> From: Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> >> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org >> Subject: RM: ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | unstable/non-free | source, i386, mips >> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) >> >> Package: ftp.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> >> Please remove ipadic packages in unstable and testing of non-free archive to >> complete non-free to main transition. >> >> It seems package transition script does not seem to handle rare case of >> transition from non-free and main smoothly and need some handholding. >> >> Here is a bit more detail to this request. >> >> I have recently moved ipadic package from non-free to main. >> >> When I try to upload newer version fixing RC bug (2.7.0-3), it is >> rejected as follows. (I tried twice and rejected twice. So this is not >> a freak transit problem.) >> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 03:06:14PM +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >>> Reject Reasons: >>> ipadic_2.7.0-3_amd64.changes file already known to dak >>> === >>> >>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >>> concerns. >> >> I checked archive and found that this ipadic package is in very strange >> situation as follows. >> >> osamu@ries:~$ dak ls ipadic >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | oldstable/non-free | source, i386, mips >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | stable/non-free | source, i386, mips >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | testing/non-free | source, i386, mips >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | unstable/non-free | source, i386, mips >> ipadic | 2.7.0-2 | unstable | source, amd64 >> >> $ apt-cache madison ipadic >> ipadic | 2.7.0-2 | http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 >> Packages >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian/ sid/main Sources >> ipadic | 2.7.0-2 | http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian/ sid/main Sources >> ipadic | 2.6.3-2 | http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian/ sid/non-free >> Sources >> ipadic | 2.7.0-2 | http://ftp.jp.debian.org/debian/ sid/non-free >> Sources >> >> It looks odd to see there are 2 unstable package sources both in >> non-free and main with different version. The older non-free should >> have been removed. I can not think any other reason why upload of newer >> version is rejected with bogus claim "already known to dak". >> >> The original package uploaded to main was created with -sa option. The >> orig.tar.gz source package was accepted. Thanks to ftp-master, it seems >> it was adjusted by manually later. But old 2.6.3-2 package is still in >> unstable of non-free although 2.7.0-2 is in unstable of main. This >> awkward situation seems to cause problem to dak and rejecting valid >> upload. >> >> I think next step for making this transition is to remove ipadic packages in >> unstable and testing of non-free. >> >> Then 2.7.0-3 fixing RC bug may be accepted :-) >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> Osamu >> >> FYI: Another package with recent non-free -> main change >> osamu@ries:~$ dak l mozc >> mozc | 1.2.855.102-1 | testing/non-free | source >> mozc | 1.2.855.102-2 | unstable | source (This was first main) >> mozc | 1.2.855.102-3 | unstable | source >> >> >> > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
