-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/11/2011 18:06, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Maybe we can ask upstream, whether the RBAC code and the rest of the > patch set can be separated? I don't think there's much interest in RBAC > for a Debian feature set, while the rest is quite interesting. > Unfortunately, I already asked upstream about a nicely splitted patch, but Brad didn't seem interested back in time. It might be worth re-asking though.
Regards, - -- Yves-Alexis Perez ANSSI/ACE/LAM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOvAcIAAoJENcc3UqWxbaOK3cP/jUKp59eQbTfQ30JmQsAtKFB 3A2r9PRFvs0eex7O/DYXz2Ua/MFnfCxYg2Xuv79aqH+8mBX/WlmNmZfL7uHCT3Zx AgvT6A4LFxm5HNtQV4xnqflmEaxFCWBxVgv39ITeCvNKfxXKM6tYIXmb38GEhB79 srxrL1wW7Kad62YXngQeltTWbJIkWBBgcC29zERXpY/DDoQhwAvel4jSTu+L54NB zmc8X3YI7gcwMq0Xke+aPNqGu+IfQaUpOu8BVa3WwxN8fNhYkDddkmrJ2YdpcjeJ sawNl08d6zgZWntDTKe/KjvJpV9goxP/jKR9vUFYgSl+S90tGKzMzpAQFddgwTh9 h422D1Pbd9swyHQ32AN2RIxVEAf6zXcyZPpGw5NSdsbwu3A+1A4/BsTDkVNOKarq msS+0tFwSdwqe8aOvFawenuHmh1s33c6urZn6Bve6a1tWCTs1Lapydcl34VYAJrX ii5zsBAlA/Vl3NujUh8V0rvYzHADB4qjQFIUS+TyEEOaHLVBK4/fUlcGxZnS4HcV 6lw/+Nm7nSbgwBv7lbGRJwOgoT38KRNsh/03IQyC8qNLooHn31HJvctGxMt+o7Hu E2HqxJC2SPBQGoPXQdqRHK+Bi2z/ukS4u3dtfWsBZxkQQVi9w3Zq7Ele6dx7cXvb YOF14DsTQbVkg+hgaptH =j3zh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
