* Frédéric Bothamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Ok, it is your choice (obviously!). I am not really sure that there > won't be any duplicate bugs, meaning more work for you (and, as a user > of Debian, I would have found useful to have a workaround to a IMHO > broken upstream behaviour).
It's easy to close bugs :) > BTW why did you close the bug if you want to let it viewable tagged with > "wontfix"? Bugs don't go away when you close them, they merely get archived. The tag shows I'm not going to do what you asked, and leaving it open would be a bit silly, since I doubt any one else will ask for this. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
