Alle lunedì 31 ottobre 2011, Jussi Hakala ha scritto: > On 10/31/2011 05:03 PM, Pino Toscano wrote: > >> If they are not used at all, should we remove them from the dev > >> package? > > > > No, given there are 16 or so sources using the poppler core API > > (most were using an embedded xpdf source in the past). > > I'm confused, should there not be a dependency (or suggestion) in > place for those headers that cannot be removed then? > > Or are these 16 sources, that are using the core api, pulling in > themselves the additional dev packages they need?
Almost none (if not really none at all) of the sources using poppler core use also any of the three headers mentioned[1]. [1] XpdfPluginAPI.h, DCTStream.h, JPEG2000Stream.h > > That's why I said "installed" for all of them (I suspected you were > > doing such search in the headers in the sources). > > My original patch was against earlier version of the source package > in which some of those files were installed in the dev package, it > seems I didn't notice all the changes between that and the latest > one in sid... Copying all the core headers to the installation prefix was a mistake I fixed when preparing poppler 0.16.x. Even if, say, CurlCachedFile.h was installed, it would have been unuseful anyway, given the code it refers was not compiled in, resulting in linking errors. -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
