On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:38:17 -0700, Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> said:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 08:43:49PM -0400, Simon L'nu wrote:
> > > slapd runs fine here, including on i386, when I test it. It also
> > > passed its test suite when built on the buildds. This may be a gnutls
> > > problem, but it's not as simple as "running slapd with no options
> > > whatever". In particular, your list of mapped modules includes a large
> > > number of slapd plugins which are not loaded by default. So to debug
> > > this, we're going to need to see a slapd config that can be used to
> > > reproduce it.
>
> > i'm happy it runs for you :).
>
> Well, that means I can't help you fix the problem because I can't reproduce
> it. Can you please send us a slapd configuration that we could use to
> reproduce the problem?
i know :).
i'd rather avoid sending you that to the BTS if at all possible (if i do,
i'll send you that off-BTS).
> > > If anything, I suspect the recent patch to change ltdl behavior to be
> > > responsible. This was meant to fix bug #327585, but it affects the
> > > loading of all modules, not just back_perl. Could you try rebuilding
> > > slapd with
> > > debian/patches/switch-to-lt_dlopenadvise-to-get-RTLD_GLOBAL-set.diff
> > > commented out of debian/patches/series, to see if that fixes the
> > > problem for you?
>
> > i'll do it soon.
>
> Ok, thanks. We really don't want to back that patch out though if we can
> avoid it, so a reproducible test case is still needed.
building now, will know shortly enough.
simon
--
We can use symlinks of course... syslogd would be a symlink to syslogp and
ftpd and ircd would be linked to ftpp and ircp... and of course the
point-to-point protocol paenguin.
-- Kevin M. Bealer, commenting on the penguin Linux logo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
