Hi, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 02:54:27PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > Because it produces a false positive in security auditing tools, and
what are they warning about in a completely correct file? > non-standard and unexpected behavior to find hidden files outside > of /home that you had not explicitly created yourself. True, but it's not forbidden either. > Why can't it be called services.rdb.orig, services.rdb.upstream, > services.rdb.default, or something more useful/descriptive and not > hidden? services.rdb.default can be done. I just didn't want it to appear either way, exactly to make people wonder. > If that seems ok, I will create a patch and remove the wontfix. If you get upgrades to work, why not.. But the problem then would be that we then need even more tightened Pre-Depends.. :) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
