On 07/10/2011 11:49, Michael Prokop wrote:
https://github.com/foudfou/zsh-completion/blob/master/_systemctl is
licensed under GPLv3, sadly that's not the best start to get it
included in Zsh upstream therefore (since Zsh doesn't use a
GPL-style license). :)
Dear Foudil (author of the systemctl completion): any chance you
could put it under the MIT-like license Zsh is using so we could ask
for upstream inclusion?
Hi Michael,
Basically, I wouldn't mind changing the license to an MIT-like one.
But:
- I couldn't find any clear indication in the zsh documentation/sources/website
stating that contributions must be provided under the same license as zsh itself
- zsh ships completion functions released under the GPL (_darcs, _osc for
instance)
- zsh is also known to be BSD-like
(http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2008/msg00184.html)
All this leaves me in a confused state :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
