On 10/04/2011 11:07 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> On 09/30/2011 02:43 PM, Robert Millan wrote: >>> 2011/9/28 Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org>: > >>>> Does this mean that the package has to become Arch: any now? That seems >>>> wrong to me... >>> >>> Not necessarily, you can instead use: >>> >>> Depends: fuse | fuse4bsd >> >> S3QL depends on fuse when running on Linux, and on FUSE4BSD when running >> on FreeBSD. It is, however, not able to use fuse when running on >> FreeBSD, or bsdfuse when running on Linux, which the above dependency >> allows as well. >> >> Now, in this case this probably isn't a problem because (I assume) the >> fuse4bsd package doesn't exist for Linux, and the fuse package doesn't >> exist for kFreeBSD. > > I believe that "Depends: fuse | fuse4bsd" is correct here. If someone > manages to get plain fuse working on kFreeBSD, then it should satisfy the > dependency.
Yeah, I agree. But I'm trying to make a more general point: what's wrong with an arch: all package having arch-dependend deps? Why isn't that allowed? Thanks, -Nikolaus -- »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
