On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Stefan Bühler <stbueh...@lighttpd.net> wrote: > On 10/04/2011 01:34 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Adam Nielsen<a.niel...@shikadi.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> but at least in this case the files will >>> both be small enough that it shouldn't really be a problem in practice. >> >> Shouldn't? Really? Those qualifications indicate potential problems. >> >> Splitting lighttpd.conf makes things harder for the majority of users. >> For some, it might make things a little bit easier. >> >> The only conclusion I can draw is that it should not be split. > > I disagree. The proposed settings in platform.conf should only > be changed by the package maintainers or very experienced users > who know that they'll have to change many other things like logrotate, init > scripts and so on, so it is ok to put them into a separate file.
I'm not sure why that would make it ok to move them to another file. > Oh, and btw: the config is already splitted anyway, so why do you care about > another extra file? No extra conf files are enabled by default. And the extra conf files are all module specific. -- Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
