On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, +15:54:40 EET (UTC +0200), Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> pressed some keys:
> * Juhapekka Tolvanen <juht...@iki.fi>, 2011-01-27, 04:13: > >Please check out files in this WWW-directory: > > > >http://iki.fi/juhtolv/tmp/bugreports/python-docutils/01/harjoitukset/ > > > >When I run that script called compileall.sh almost everything > >works like a charm. Even Tidy thinks XML-code that rst2xml created > >is valid. But when Publican tries to validate (let alone convert) > >that XML-code, it gives umpteen gazillion errors. They all can be > >seen in that file publican_errors.txt . > Thanks for your bug report. I'm afraid that errors you are seeing > are expected: rst2xml doesn't produce DocBook XML documents (and it > was never intended to do so!), which is the format Publican expects. Why on earth they waste their time coding and maintaining some utility, that outputs XML-code written in neverheard-DTD? And that tool called rst2pseudoxml must be even more ridiculous waste of time. What good is it? Almost everybody who knows at least something about XML have heard about a DTD called Docbook and therefore probably starts using it. Docbook is probably the most used XML-DTD in the world. Are those developers of python-docutils living inside a bottle or barrel? Meanwhile I use pandoc, but it would be nice, if python-docutils included some tool for converting RST to Docbook-XML. -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv "Quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
