Le Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:46:51PM +0200, Luca Falavigna a écrit : > > Several locations are not up-to-date with current release information. > > Attached patch should solve this, by refreshing some information related > to releases, supported architectures, and number of packages.
> Index: resources.dbk > =================================================================== > --- resources.dbk (revisione 8928) > +++ resources.dbk (copia locale) > @@ -534,10 +534,9 @@ > architectures. Debian 2.1 shipped for the <literal>i386</literal>, > <literal>m68k</literal>, <literal>alpha</literal>, and > <literal>sparc</literal> architectures. Since then Debian has grown hugely. > -Debian 5 supports a total of twelve architectures: <literal>alpha</literal>, > -<literal>amd64</literal>, <literal>arm</literal>, > -<literal>armel</literal>, <literal>hppa</literal>, > -<literal>i386</literal>, <literal>ia64</literal>, <literal>mips</literal>, > +Debian 6 supports a total of nine architectures: <literal>amd64</literal>, > +<literal>armel</literal>, <literal>i386</literal>, > +<literal>ia64</literal>, <literal>mips</literal>, > <literal>mipsel</literal>, <literal>powerpc</literal>, > <literal>s390</literal>, <literal>sparc</literal>. > </para> Hi Luca, I wonder if the absence of kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 from the list above might not be wrongly interpreted. How about mentioning them as technology preview ? Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org