Hello, On 09/30/2011 01:04 PM, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:38:22PM +0200, Luca Capello a écrit : >> The laboratory where I am working at needs PAML, but on a squeeze >> system. However, backports are allowed only for those packages that are >> in testing. Is there any reason why paml has not been uploaded to >> unstable yet? >> >> FYI, version 4.4c-3 builds fine on an up-to-date squeeze chroot. > these situations are often explained by loss of momentum… I can upload soon. > > I see that that the latest upstream release is version 4.4e. Would that be > acceptable as well ? if I recall correctly, then PAML was one of those "fix local needs" and "train the new maintainer" kind of packages. I do not recall exactly why it was not sent to unstable. I presume some missing man pages and/or some documentation that was not set aside or ... it needs a review for sure.
Best, Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
