Dnia 2011-09-29, czw o godzinie 12:52 +0000, Florian Weimer pisze: > * Pawel Tecza: > > > Really? Why I should remove one package for upgrading other package on > > *stable* system? Is it a new Debian policy? I'm a long time Debian user > > and admin and I don't remember similar case. > > Past BIND 9 updates had similar requirements.
I don't have BIND 9 on my machines, so I don't know about that issue. Yes, I can understand that I should purge any buggy package which has a very important security holes and they can't be fixed. But I can't realize that I should remove a package, because its maintainer doesn't want to increase dependency version. > > Suppose that my developers need that Cacao package. What then? IMHO it's > > not a good solution. > > The Recommends: which installed the Cacao package was probably > unintended, and the package is almost certainly unused your systems. > The Cacao-based JVM is not ready for production purposes. I need to consult it with my developers. I'm a free man, so I have a right to install also unused packages on my server ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
