could you forward/check in this upstream? On 09/26/2011 10:33 PM, Petr Salinger wrote: > user debian-...@lists.debian.org > usertag 642928 + kfreebsd > usertag 642162 + kfreebsd > -- > >> Could be this related to CPU ? >> My is "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6750" >> asdfasdf's "AMD Sempron(tm) Processor 3000+" > > After changing configure.ac and propagating it into > configure, the testsuite of 3.0.11~rc1-2 succeeds > also on asdfasdf.d.n > > === libffi Summary === > > # of expected passes 1649 > # of unsupported tests 15 > > > --- configure.ac > +++ configure.ac > @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ > [Cannot use PROT_EXEC on this target, so, we revert to > alternative means]) > ;; > - *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | *-pc-solaris*) > + *-apple-darwin10* | *-*-freebsd* | *-*-kfreebsd* | *-*-openbsd* | > *-pc-solaris*) > AC_DEFINE(FFI_MMAP_EXEC_WRIT, 1, > [Cannot use malloc on this target, so, we revert to > alternative means]) > > > IMHO, similar change might help to solve > "gcj fails under fash.d.o, but not fano.d.o". > > Petr > > >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
