Hi,

* Georgi Guninski <gunin...@guninski.com> wrote:
> i am not sure --check-sigs will fix this.

I am pretty sure that check-sigs will not fix this :)

> the keyring contains the colliding ID pub key and according to my tests
> --check-sigs works too on ubuntu - the signatures are correct and the keys
> are present.

What do you mean by "works too on ubuntu"?

When called with --list-sigs, the output is the same as when gpg is called
with --check-sigs, just an exclamation mark is added:

$ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring ./ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg --with-colons 
--list-sigs DB046AD3 | grep -v pub
[...]
sig:::17:8B56ED98DB046AD3:2011-09-21::::ubun1 <ubun1@aaaaaaa>:13x:
sig:::17:8B56ED98DB046AD3:2011-09-21::::ubun1 <ubun1@aaaaaaa>:18x:

$ gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring ./ubuntu-archive-keyring.gpg --with-colons 
--check-sigs DB046AD3 | grep -v pub
[...]
sig:!::17:8B56ED98DB046AD3:2011-09-21::::ubun1 <ubun1@aaaaaaa>:13x:
sig:!::17:8B56ED98DB046AD3:2011-09-21::::ubun1 <ubun1@aaaaaaa>:18x:

This suggests that it makes no difference whether gpg is called with
list-sigs or check-sigs here.

Regards,
- Alex

Attachment: pgp4i8UIpwl5Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to