2011/9/17 Arnaud Fontaine <ar...@debian.org>: > Hi, > >> I have checked on difference of 2011h from 2010b: >> >> * API changes are minimal and seems to be backward compatible * >> primarily it is an update of timezones information >> >> I saw no harm of updating unstable with it, so I did a sloppy uupdate, >> cloned original bugreport to leave 3k compatibility on TODO list, >> tested the package (lintian warnings remained), and uploaded to >> 10-days delayed. (if you don't mind, I could re-upload to 0-delay ;) ) >> >> If rejected/objected, NMU and its backports for all recent Debian and >> Ubuntu releases could be found at neuro.debian.net > > Indeed, I was waiting for Gediminas to confirm that there is no problem > with updating the packages in pkg-zope SVN repository (which includes > pytz) to ZTK 1.1.2 before uploading these packages... Gediminas: have > you had time to look at that? > > While the upload of pytz seems harmless, I would prefer to follow ZTK > 1.1.2 versions (unless Gediminas disagrees of course), which suggests > pytz 2011g (even if it's just a small change).
I would like all the work that is already done uploaded first, and only then look what is not up-to-date with ZTK 1.1 pytz is not even part of ZTK, and should always be the latest, so this discussion did not need to happen. I can update the ZTK myself, and the bump of pytz version would be one I would worry the least about. It is best to match the tzdata version, because python-tz package uses that data instead of the included one. tzdata in sid is already at 2011j. -- Gediminas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
