Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 10:09 +0200, Loïc Minier a écrit : > - is it ok not to comply with policy when this never happens in > concrete usecases? (here, the use is never going to install > gedit-common without gedit)
I believe this isn't OK. > On my side, I'm looking at being policy compliant again, but it's not > going to be funny (especially because of downgrades :-/). You only have to make the new gedit package conflict with the current gedit-common. As alternatives are removed in the prerm, this is OK. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
