Package: lsb-core
Version: 3.2-28
Severity: minor
The fix for #638450 looked like this:
diff -pruN 3.2-27/debian/postinst 3.2-28/debian/postinst
--- 3.2-27/debian/postinst 2010-09-18 22:01:52.000000000 +0000
+++ 3.2-28/debian/postinst 2011-08-26 20:40:00.000000000 +0000
@@ -22,8 +22,10 @@ setup_ldso_symlink () {
ln -sf ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.1
ln -sf ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.2
ln -sf ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3
- ln -sf /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.2
- ln -sf /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3
+ ln -sf ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.2
+ ln -sf ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3
+ [ -L /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.2 ] && rm /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.2 ||
true
+ [ -L /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 ] && rm /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 ||
true
;;
ia64)
ln -sf ld-linux-ia64.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb-ia64.so.1
diff -pruN 3.2-27/debian/prerm 3.2-28/debian/prerm
--- 3.2-27/debian/prerm 2011-01-17 20:17:59.000000000 +0000
+++ 3.2-28/debian/prerm 2011-08-26 20:31:18.000000000 +0000
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ remove_ldso_symlink () {
rm -f /lib/ld-lsb.so.[123]
;;
amd64)
- rm -f /lib/ld-lsb.so.[123] /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.2
+ rm -f /lib/ld-lsb.so.[123] /lib64/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.[23]
/lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.[23]
;;
*)
echo "ld-lsb-*.so.1 symlink for $ARCH is unknown; not removed."
Nothing ever created /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.[23] symlinks in the first
place, so as far as I can see there's no need to clean them up; the
problem was that the symlink *target* was wrong. Isn't this dead code?
(I initially thought that this was actively dangerous since /lib64 might
be a symlink to /lib so this would create the ld-lsb-* symlinks and then
delete them again, but since you depend on libc6 (>= 2.13-17) this
appears not to be the case.)
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
