* Nicholas Bamber: > Please could have someone have a look at #641950? This module was > packaged as it has been flagged up as a dependency of a new version of > an existing package. However based upon the comments in the bug report > it really is something we do not wish to encourage. > In any case the CPAN module seems to be dead upstream. Should we simply > adjust the description (and if so what tone should be taken) or should > the package be removed?
RC4 is used by protocols we might want to implement, so we need the code. As far as I understand it, there are relatively safe ways to use the cipher, even though it is severely broken. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
