Hi, It is great to get quick response like this. Thanks.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:25:47PM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 02:42:13AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think this bug report is for 0.3.4 > > > > Newer upstream release made these features default on. > > > > Anyway, most recent is vimoutliner-0.3.6.tgz — Version 0.3.6 > > uh, well, I'm a bit puzzled. Last time I looked nothing let to believe, > that there might happen a release or that one happened, > but how should I have known that upstream silently discarded > vimoutliner.org and moved to github? I did not know either until I did some digging few days ago. > Do you know what happend to vimoutliner.org? It hasn't been updated > since a while and led me to believe that upstream development > is stalled. I do not know much. All I know is I found/guessed this upstream state from the data on vim official plugin site: http://www.vim.org/ Specifically at http://www.vim.org/scripts/index.php There are many organizer but this looks like what we looked for. http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3515 There is a link to git hub. There is link to: http://www.vim.org/account/profile.php?user_id=28449 This link to: http://lists.vimoutliner.org/mailman/listinfo/vimoutliner There are others but looks like not something we looked for: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=517 http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3342 vimoutliner.org seems quiet except it mailing list has some minor activity. Please subscribe and upstream about situation. http://lists.vimoutliner.org/mailman/listinfo/vimoutliner http://lists.vimoutliner.org/pipermail/vimoutliner/2011-September/003968.html > > There has been good amount of bug fixes. Patrick, are you still active? > > You have not responded to Joey's #575142 report either. > > Yes, I am, but > > 1) I didn't notice that there is any activity because I haven't > noticed that upstream change to github. Has there been an announcement, > that I missed? I do not know much... > 2) I've been a bit low on time recently, dunno, if I find time to update > the package in the next time, but I'll see what I can do. Please. > 3) I did not reply to Joeys ticket, because there was nothing to reply > on. He is right and I'm pretty sure there is no need to tell him that. > Kept it open to fix it as soon as I do another upload. Shame on me that > it did not happen yet. > > > PS: Since upstream uses git now, using git for Debian package seems to > > make more sense. > > Well, my choice of version control system is not tied to whatever > upstream uses, but yes I will switch to git (as I've done that for most > of my packages). I'm not sure, but I think I've already converted the > svn to git a while ago, but have not pushed it anywere yet. Have to > check that. The system I'm used to work with for Debian work, is not > around currently. > > Thanks for the bug report and the help to discover that upstream > work is indeed going on :o) Well, good to hear you are active. Osamu > Best Regards, > Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
