On sam., 2011-09-17 at 04:42 -0400, Chris Frey wrote: > Does this mean it is "closed" in Squeeze as well? I was hoping for > a fix in Squeeze (or at least keep it open). I'm not sure what the tag means, > and I don't see it via the web anymore.
Closing means the bug is fixed. Versioning indicates in which versions it's present and in which it's fixed. Tagging squeeze means it's present in squeeze. > > Is there any flexibility with upgrading to 2.31.x or 2.32.x in squeeze? Not really. There might be backports or you might ask for them. > I'm guessing not, but is it worth testing them? It might be worth identifiying when the bug was closed upstream and see if it's possible to backport that fix to stable. Not something I'll be able to do soon though, but if you manage to identify a relevant patch, that would definitely help. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
