On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:13:21PM -0600, Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:01:47 +0000, Thorsten Glaser <t...@mirbsd.de> wrote: > Nothing is "forced on the user", the conffile handling is doing exactly > what is expected. If the admin chooses to not accept the update, the > worst that happens is they have to fully qualify command paths until > they've patched up sudoers.
Well, given the magnitude of the potential breakage if the user does not notice it immediatly, you could add that change to a separate file in /etc/sudoers.d. Almost all sudo users have an edited /etc/sudoers. There is three related problem-reports on debian-testing already. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
