Yann Dirson wrote: > Hm, having configure step as part of the build actions, as opposed to > being actions of a configure-specific target like has been done since > a number of years, would probably be useful to mention in the dh > manpage.
I'm not familiar with such a target. > In fact the list of supported sequences that one can get by calling > "dh foo" would be good to have in the manpage. Perhaps in the first paragraph like it does now? > Similarly, the precise > relation between build/install/binary and their -arch/-indep > counterparts could be more precisely described I believe that the second paragraph of the man page does so, to the extent that users of dh need to worry about it. Unless it's somehow not clear that eg binary is a union of binary-arch and binary-indep. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
