On 03/09/11 10:16, Jörg Sommer wrote: > Hello Simon, > > I can't see in which way #635383 is related to changes in the resolvconf > script. Is this bug report number correct? Or should it have been > #627789? > > dnsmasq (2.58-2) unstable; urgency=low > > * Fix resolvconf script. (closes: #635383)
The bug number is wrong, as you surmise, I was having a bad day. I've reopened 635383 and reassigned it to virtualbox. The bug that should have been closed is 639963, and I've closed that by hand. I've fixed the changelog for the next upload. > > Why not set no-poll and send SIGHUP to tell dnsmasq about changes? The only reason not to is that writes to /etc/resolv.conf other than from resolvconf would no longer be picked up in a timely manner. Cheers, Simon. > > Bye, Jörg. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
