Hi again, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 14:34:56 -0500, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>> The only potentially problematic commit I could find is the following. >> It might be worth testing with it backed out. > > Hey, Jonathan. I haven't done much kernel rebuilding at all, so I'm not > sure what's the best way to rebuild my kernel with this patch reverted. > If you can give me a few pointers on a good way to do that it would be > much appreciated. Presumably I should start by apt-getting source > linux-image-3.0.0-1-amd64? Is a straight debuild then the best way to > rebuild the kernel after applying the change? Now I'm in suspense. Did you get a chance to test the kernel with Tejun Heo's commit bf2253a6f00e[1] reverted? The method you suggest should work fine, too, for what it's worth. There are instructions for patching the kernel and building one flavor at a time at http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.3 Thanks, Jonathan [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638887#59 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
