On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:58:04AM +0200, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 01:28:53, Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> > > FYI, I'm already working on it so it will be fixed soon.
> >
> > there's not much to do, simply adding a "| openjdk-7-jre" to the
> > dependency is enough.
>
> Have you tested Java Access Bridge with openjdk-7 ?
No, but see below:
> > (And if there would be any possible problems with that, then the
> > unversioned dependency on default-jre would already be a serious bug.)
>
> Yes, that's a known problem of default-jre being different between archs (ie.
>
> hurd or kfreebsd) :/
That is not the problem I had in mind.
At some point in the future default-jre will depend on openjdk-7-jre.
If that might be a problem, then the unversioned dependency on
default-jre is already bug.
But even versioning the dependency on default-jre wouldn't solve
all problems:
Even if you enforce that a Java 6 JRE is installed, you have no
influence on what JRE is running your code since several JRE's
can be installed in parallel.
> Cheers,
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
