El 31/08/11 13:38, Steffen Möller escribió:
I have not found the FAQ but google gave the answer that the AGPL is not
found in packages frequently enough. Great to hear that it is requested
frequently enough to make it in the frequently AQ.
Sorry for not explaining everything before.
I refer to this:
Q. Why isn't license "foo" included in common-licenses?
A. I delegate such decisions to the policy group. If you want to
propose a new license you should make a policy proposal to modify the
paragraph in policy saying "Packages distributed under the UCB BSD
license, Artistic license, GNU GPL and GNU LGPL should refer to the
files in /usr/share/common-licenses". The way of doing this is
explained in the debian-policy package. As usual, you should always
take a look at already reported bugs against debian-policy before
submitting a new one.
which can be read in /usr/share/doc/base-files/FAQ.
If you prefer, you can reopen and reassign this bug to debian-policy but
it's already reported.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
