Hi, I made the upload, so I guess I should comment on this.
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 15:39 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Philipp Kern <pk...@debian.org>, 2011-08-28, 10:52: > >The package FTBFS'es on mips, powerpc, s390, sparc and the inofficial > >ports s390x and powerpcspe because of changes in the symbol set wrt the > >symbols file: > > Hmm, symbols file was added in 0.7-5, even though it isn't mentioned in > the changelog. Yep, sorry, forgot to add that one to the changelog... > >- spifhash_jenkinsLE@Base 0.7 > >+#MISSING: 0.7-5# spifhash_jenkinsLE@Base 0.7 > > Looking at the source code spifhash_jenkinsLE is only defined on > little-endian systems. Yes. > >+ spiftool_regexp_match@Base 0.7-5 > >+ spiftool_regexp_match_r@Base 0.7-5 > > These two OTOH are defined everywhere and I don't understand why they > weren't included in the symbols file. Even lintian loudly complains: > > E: libast2: symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision on > symbol spiftool_regexp_match@Base and 1 others Except lintian didn't complain at all when I built it in a freshly updated chroot. These symbols are actually conditional on the presence of some header (regex.h) from libc6-dev, so I guess my build might have happened in a time window when there were some multi-arch related header problems. Anyway, I'll fix that with a new upload today. Regis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
