This one time, at band camp, Jochen Friedrich said: > Hi Stephen, > > did I miss something or are NMUs for minor bug allowed now even > without a delay slot? > > BTW: The way you did it (without opening a bug with the corresponding > patch) would habe been a good way to ensure the bug will be back in > the next version, as the patch does not magically appear in our SVN > just by submitting an NMU ;-)
Hi, Sorry about that - I was planning to do the nmudiff dance, and got distracted. I've done so now. The upload was based on this conversation on #debian-release: 16:51:11< sgran> hello. 610306 is biting me at work. Would you consider an upload with that patch for a stable point release update? 16:51:56 * jcristau holds the 'not before it's fixed in sid' card 16:52:51< sgran> that's fair enough 16:52:56< sgran> I'd be willing to do both 16:52:59< adsb> there's that, but in general yeah from a first glance it sounds reasonable enough 16:53:13< sgran> cool 16:53:29< sgran> I'll try to get it uploaded in the next few days and then follow up with a mail? 16:53:55< adsb> the severity's below our technical radar for stable, but I'd argue the bug should be > minor anyway 16:54:24< sgran> the issue we're seeing is that it breaks puppet's logic for "is the service running", so it restarts snmpd on every puppet run 16:54:35< adsb> sgran: a usertagged bug would be nice if you could :) they're easier to keep track of than random mails on the list 16:54:45< sgran> sounds good 16:54:46< sgran> will do 16:54:48< sgran> thanks 16:55:02< adsb> that sounds suboptimal. and not "minor". at least imho Sorry for not sending that to the bug log earlier. Cheers, -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sg...@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
