On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 23:57, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:21, Toni Mueller <supp...@oeko.net> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, 15.11.2010 at 09:08:42 +0100, Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: >>> That's great! :) I think that we can wait for ~1 week and if the new >>> gkrellm doesn't fail you, I can close this bug as fixed in the recent >>> version: what do you think? >> >> that's what I hoped, too, but you should already have my message from >> this morning in your mailbox, stating that the new version doesn't >> really fix the problem. It only looks like making the problem appear >> a little less often. > > gaah, I was hoping it was fixed :( anyhow, can you try to run gkrellm > passing '-d 0x80' from the command line? it will print all the debug > information for the 'sensors' category, maybe we're lucky and it will > print what's happening.
Is this still happening? can you please provide the above requested information? -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
