On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:38:56AM -0600, Barak Pearlmutter wrote:
> This isn't djview's fault, is it?
Shouldn't djview have remained in unstable as long as some of its
dependencies were still there? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the working
of Debian distributions, but surely migration must proceed in
"dependencies-first" order, musn't it?
Anyway, I'm willing to lay the blame at somebody else's door: who do
you think it should be? :-)
--
David A. Madore
([EMAIL PROTECTED],
http://www.madore.org/~david/ )
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
