15.08.2011 17:39, Miguel Mismo wrote:
> 
>> Can you try booting without virt-manager, with just one
>> vCPU please?
>> So that we can narrow it down to particular combination.
> 
> Ok, I tried with the following command following your instructions (1 CPU).
> It's a modification from what gives libvirt:
> 
> /usr/bin/kvm -M pc-0.12 -enable-kvm -m 614 -smp \
> 1,sockets=1,cores=1,threads=1 -name ... -uuid ... \
> -nodefaults -rtc base=utc -boot c \
> -drive file=...,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0,boot=on,format=raw \
> -device ide-drive,bus=ide.0,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-0-0,id=ide0-0-0 \
> -device e1000,vlan=0,id=net0,mac=...,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3  -usb \
> -device usb-tablet,id=input0 -k es -vga cirrus \
> -device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4
> 
> 
> I launched it 10 times, and yes, it booted without problems.

Ok, that gives us something as a starting point.  Now to find
out what breaks when you start it from libvirt.  Several vCPUs?

>> 2.6.32-35 to be exact.
> 
> I'll give exact kernel versions:
> 
> On squeeze vm's:
> 
> $ uname -r
> 2.6.32-5-amd64

That will be seen on output of uname -r on all squeeze kernels,
since they're all of this "version".  What matters here alot is
the debian package revision number, or complete debian version
of the kernel package.  dpkg -l | grep linux-image will give
this info, and it will look like that 2.6.32-35 I quoted (I
found it in your original bugreport in autogenerated section).

Thank you,

/mjt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to